MXLFORCE METROLOGY

Engineering guide / reviewed 31 October 2026

Multi-Axis Load Cell Design, Crosstalk & Calibration Guide

A multi-axis load cell resolves a load vector. Its calibration defines how electrical signals map to those components.

Independent bridges and matrix decoupling solve different problems.

Some three-axis architectures provide separately scaled mV/V outputs. Other multi-component architectures require a calibration matrix to combine sensing channels. Mechanical decoupling reduces unwanted response; it does not eliminate the need for model-specific calibration and validation.

Interface describes independent axis outputs for its 3A120. ATI explains matrix processing for its force/torque sensors. Those manufacturer descriptions establish architecture examples, not MXL test results.

Define crosstalk with the excitation axis and denominator.

Apply a known load on one axis and measure the apparent response on the other axes. State whether the result is normalized to the loaded-axis full scale, the receiving-axis full scale or the applied load. A bare percentage cannot be compared reliably across unequal ranges.

The MXL design target is below 1% FS for supported configurations. The actual value, loading conditions and calibration method must be recorded for the selected model. A matrix can reduce residual coupling within its calibrated envelope; extrapolation beyond that envelope needs validation.

Calibrate the installed load path and coordinate frame.

  1. Record sensor serial number, drawing revision, mounting torque, orientation and DAQ configuration.
  2. Zero the complete assembly in its reference state.
  3. Apply traceable positive and negative loads across the required range on every active axis.
  4. Evaluate off-axis residuals and relevant combined-force/moment cases.
  5. Store uncertainty, temperature conditions, conversion coefficients and calibration revision with the test record.

ME-Meßsysteme documents matrix-based conversion for K6D/F6D multi-component sensors. Calibration is tied to the specific architecture and configuration.

Offsets turn forces into moments.

A force applied away from the reference origin creates a moment: M = r × F. A three-axis force-only sensor still has mechanical moment limits. A six-axis system must transform both forces and moments when changing from the sensor origin to the tool center point.

Use a force ratio only with a known contact normal.

The resultant magnitude uses all three components. A friction ratio additionally assumes a known surface frame, quasi-static loading and a sufficiently large normal force. The force direction alone cannot identify an unknown surface normal.

Explore the force vector

Resultant: 111.803 N

Illustrative friction ratio: 0.5000

Ftotal = √(Fx² + Fy² + Fz²). The ratio μ = √(Fx² + Fy²) / |Fz| assumes Fz is aligned with the known surface normal and quasi-static contact. It is not a general surface-angle measurement. Illustrative math only; no live sensor data.

Prepare a testable acceptance plan.

Define noise, resolution, repeatability, uncertainty, bandwidth, timing skew, thermal drift and residual coupling. Full scale and nominal sample rate alone do not establish usable measurement performance.

Send the load case for review ↗